English 2010: Intermediate Writing: Research Writing in a Persuasive Mode

Overview

When taking English 2010, you will draft, write, and revise to:

        • Craft timely and relevant arguments for specific audiences that incorporate primary and secondary research, lived experiences, and personal authority.
        • Develop innovative research strategies by identifying relevant questions and seeking multiple perspectives.
        • Research a variety of perspectives and texts to support arguments on various topics and issues.
        • Analyze the underlying assumptions and biases in the messages you encounter daily.
        • Learn to give, receive, and implement constructive feedback.

English 2010 Outcomes


All English 2010 courses at USU have four main outcomes: Rhetorical Awareness, Critical Thinking, Information Literacy, and Composing Processes. 

Rhetorical Awareness

Writers develop rhetorical awareness by negotiating purpose, audience, context, and textual conventions as they compose a variety of texts for different rhetorical situations.

Rhetorical awareness is illustrated by the student writer’s ability to:


  • Focus on a purpose appropriate to the writer’s rhetorical situation
  • Identify and compose for a variety of audiences and contexts
  • Analyze and respond appropriately to different rhetorical situations, including as outlined in assignment prompts
  • Identify and analyze rhetorical appeals, including ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos
  • Understand and rhetorically negotiate the conventions that govern genres, formats, grammar, mechanics, and the use and citation of sources

Critical Thinking

Writers practice critical thinking when they analyze, synthesize, interpret, and evaluate ideas, information, situations, and texts. Student writers display critical thinking through both written and oral communication.

Critical thinking is illustrated by the student writer’s ability to:


  • Analyze the relationships among language, knowledge, and power in research and argument
  • Investigate and evaluate underlying assumptions in source material
  • Negotiate the influence of positionality, background, and personal bias on research and argument
  • Synthesize multiple perspectives through the use of primary and secondary research, including lived experience and counternarrative
  • Compose nuanced arguments that contain appropriate and sufficient evidence



Information Literacy

Writers practice information literacy when they understand research as a process of critical inquiry, consider the influence of power on texts, and become creators of information through both written and oral communication. 

Information literacy is illustrated by the student writer’s ability to:


  • Develop and investigate a nuanced research question for a specific audience and purpose
  • Evaluate the relevance and credibility of a variety of primary and secondary sources and apply the evaluation to the student researcher’s rhetorical purpose
  • Negotiate the implications of the research on multiple groups and seek perspectives that complicate notions of credibility and authority in research
  • Join a conversation by seeking multiple perspectives, recognizing gaps in the research, reflecting on personal bias, and synthesizing texts and perspectives
  • Demonstrate academic integrity by accurately and effectively summarizing, paraphrasing, quoting, and citing a variety of texts and perspectives

Composing Processes

Writers employ multiple composing processes to conceptualize, draft, write, revise, and finalize both written and oral projects. Writers’ composing processes are flexible and seldom linear.

Composing processes are illustrated by the student writer’s ability to:


  • Skillfully organize ideas, claims, and support according to audience and purpose
  • Collaborate with other writers on drafts and successive revisions
  • Respond to collaborator feedback, identify additional opportunities to revise, and incorporate feedback and self- assessment into revision
  • Research and synthesize additional texts or perspectives to revise or complicate arguments, claims, and analysis
  • Critically reflect on the challenges and strategies of the
    composing, research, and revision processes

General Education Communication Literacy 2 Outcomes (CL2)

Completion of English 2010 with a minimum of a C- fulfills the university’s CL2 general education requirements. The outcomes for courses with a CL2 designation, like English 2010, can be found on the general education website.


English 2010 Curriculum

The following English 2010 curriculum was designed by the Composition Program for Graduate Instructors. Experienced instructors may design and implement their own curriculum or incorporate variations of the following curriculum.

Textbook

  • From Inquiry to Academic Writing: A Practical Guide, 5th Edition, Stuart Greene and April Lidinsky, ISBN: 9781554813889

Additional Texts

English 2010 Assignment Overview

Assignment
Weight

Argument Analysis (1,000-1,200-word analytical essay)

Students select an essay from Voices of USU: An Anthology of Students Writing to analyze the effectiveness of the text’s argument and research.

15%

Minding the Gap Essay (1,300-1,400-word argumentative essay with a minimum of six cited sources)

Students compose an argument that addresses a gap in the research or argument of an essay from Voices of USU: An Anthology of Student Writing. To identify the gap in the essay’s argument or research, students analyze new developments that change the way a concept is perceived and identify a perspective or a population that might have been understudied or underrepresented in the text’s argument.

20%

Researched Argumentative Essay (2,200-2,700-word argumentative essay with a minimum of eight cited sources)

Students develop an argument supported with research about an issue of social, political, historical, or scientific significance. Students choose the topic, audience, and rhetorical strategy for their essays.

20%

Annotated Bibliography 1 (Five sources with 150+ word annotations)

To begin researching for the Researched Argumentative Essay, students complete two annotated bibliographies on their topic. For this first annotated bibliography, students gather five sources that provide an overview of the significant conversations that address their developing research question. Students spend one class session in the library investigating their topics.

5%

Annotated Bibliography 2 (Three sources with 150+ word annotations)

To continue research for the Researched Argumentative Essay, students complete a second annotated bibliography that uses the Synthesis Matrix to identify gaps in research and perspectives. This second annotated bibliography emphasizes that students research and engage with multiple perspectives as they develop nuanced arguments. Students spend one class session researching multiple perspectives.

5%

Oral Presentations (Two 7-9-minute oral presentations)

Students give oral presentations twice during the semester. In the first, the Minding the Gap Presentation, students present the gap they are researching for the Minding the Gap Essay in small groups. In the second, the Synthesis Presentation, students present on their argument with an emphasis on how their sources work together to support their argument. Students use oral, visual, and written communication in their presentations.

15%

Researcher’s Notebook (10 entries throughout the semester)

Students respond to short writing prompts that help students engage in the iterative processes of composing and researching.

15%

Attendance

Students attend and engage in-class activities. Engagement in class includes listening, responding to discussions during class, and taking notes when appropriate. Students participate using multiple formats, including discussion and group work. Students may miss three class sessions without an impact on their grade.

10%

Writing Center Tutoring Session

Once in the semester, students complete a tutoring session with an assignment from this class and compose a brief reflection about the visit. Students may complete their tutoring session by the assigned deadline at any stage in the composing process.

5%